Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Donald Raymer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ivan Donald Raymer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person does not appear to be notable, just searching the name on google news doesn't yield results. The references are mostly people. Nominated for speedy deletion, but was contested by page creator. Epass (talk) 21:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No real claim to notability. WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Pburka (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete shows no notability and the sources are all family.--TM 16:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep -- The lack of Ghits for some one who (apparetnly) retired in 1985 is not unexpected. The list of sources includes what appears to be a published work, suggesting that it is not all WP:OR. I would be reluctant to see this disappear completely, but I do have concerns as to notability. Possibly Userify, in the hope that the creator can establish notability. The subject appears to have had a long career, partly as a bible college (i.e. seminary) in mission-field countries, so may have been significant, but this cannot be determined from the article. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, searching by Ivan Donald Raymer and Ivan Raymer finds absolutely nothing on this person. This material does not pass WP:V, let alone WP:N. Abductive (reasoning) 03:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.